Skip to content

`datamodel-code-generator` vulnerable to code execution on import via `x-python-type` JSON-Schema extension in datamodel-code-generator

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 8, 2026 in datamodel-code-generator/datamodel-code-generator • Updated Jul 28, 2026

Package

pip datamodel-code-generator (pip)

Affected versions

>= 0.51.0, <= 0.60.1

Patched versions

0.60.2

Description

Summary

datamodel-code-generator honours a custom x-python-type JSON-Schema extension that lets a schema author override the generated Python type for a field. The value is forwarded verbatim into the generated Python source as the field annotation, with a single sanitisation pass that is trivial to bypass. An attacker who controls a JSON Schema fed to datamodel-codegen can therefore embed an arbitrary Python statement in the generated module, which executes at class-definition time the moment the developer imports the file. No --extra-template-data and no special flags are required; the vulnerable code is reachable with default settings.

Details

Sink: src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py, _get_python_type_override (lines 2055–2096, at tag 0.60.1 / commit a321547e):

def _get_python_type_override(self, obj: JsonSchemaObject) -> DataType | None:
    x_python_type = obj.extras.get("x-python-type")
    if not x_python_type or not isinstance(x_python_type, str):
        return None
    schema_type = obj.type if isinstance(obj.type, str) else None
    if self._is_compatible_python_type(schema_type, x_python_type):
        return None
    base_type = self._get_python_type_base(x_python_type)
    import_ = self._resolve_type_import(base_type)
    type_str = x_python_type
    prefix = x_python_type.split("[", maxsplit=1)[0]
    if "." in prefix:                                  # only sanitiser
        type_str = base_type + x_python_type[len(prefix):]
        ...
    ...
    result = self.data_type(type=type_str, import_=import_)
    ...
    return result

DataType.type flows unescaped into {{ field.type_hint }} in every model template
(model/template/pydantic_v2/BaseModel.jinja2,
model/template/dataclass.jinja2,
model/template/TypedDictClass.jinja2,
model/template/msgspec.jinja2, …).

The only sanitiser — the dot-rewrite at the marked line — fires only when . is in the substring before the first [ in the value. Placing [ early (e.g. X[1]; <payload>) keeps prefix == "X" so the rewrite is skipped and the whole value lands in the generated annotation.

from __future__ import annotations (emitted by default) makes the X[1] portion a lazy string, so X does not need to resolve at runtime. Everything after ; is parsed as a real statement in the class body and is executed when the class is constructed during import.

Output-model types confirmed vulnerable in testing: pydantic_v2.BaseModel, dataclasses.dataclass, typing.TypedDict. msgspec.Struct emits structurally identical code.

PoC

A self-contained PoC is available at: https://gist.github.com/thegr1ffyn/1a7ff2561a581074c49785230b2c5700

Impact

Arbitrary code execution in the developer's interpreter / CI runner as soon as the generated module is imported. Reachable from any workflow that ingests an untrusted JSON Schema:

  • OpenAPI / JSON-Schema documents fetched from third-party services or public registries.
  • Customer-supplied schemas in B2B platforms that auto-generate client SDKs from user input.
  • Schema files added by a malicious commit in a polyglot repository that triggers CI code generation.

The compromise is silent: the schema is valid JSON, the generator emits syntactically clean Python (the trojan statement is a single indented line in the class body), and only the use of the generated file triggers the payload.

Anyone running datamodel-codegen against an attacker-supplied schema is impacted. CI runners and developer workstations are the primary blast radius.

Resolution

The fix validates x-python-type before constructing the generated type annotation. The value is parsed with ast.parse(..., mode="eval") and accepted only when the AST is shaped like a Python type annotation, including names, attributes, subscripts, tuple/list annotation arguments, | unions, and safe literal values where annotation syntax allows them. Statements, calls, and other executable expressions are rejected before code generation. The validator is cached to avoid repeated AST parsing for repeated values.

Remediation

Upgrade to datamodel-code-generator 0.60.2 or later.

This issue affects datamodel-code-generator versions >= 0.51.0, <= 0.60.1 and is fixed in 0.60.2.

Submitted by: Hamza Haroon (thegr1ffyn)

References

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 28, 2026
Reviewed Jul 28, 2026
Last updated Jul 28, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(10th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-54655

GHSA ID

GHSA-m34r-v34r-rf9q

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.